THE PROBATORY ACTIVITY AND THE IMPARTIAL THIRD PARTY IN THE CONTRADICTORY ACCOUNT MODEL OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL CODE (DEC. LEG. N.° 957)

Authors

  • Rodolfo Castro Medina Universidad de San Martín de Porres

Keywords:

Trial activity, impartial third trial, accusatory model, delimitation of functions, techniques of oral litigation, theory of the case, equality of arms

Abstract

This article is concerned with pointing out and believing that the Criminal Procedure Code of 2004, considering the judgment stage as a main phase of the criminal proceedings under the principles of orality, publicity, immediacy, contradiction and procedural equality, among others, would demonstrate a clearly established delimitation of functions, both for the procedural parties, as well as for the impartial third party, forming a triadic scenario in the judgment. Therefore, beyond the observation, control and direction of the oral judgment, it would be counterproductive to accept some judicial intervention in the probative activity as also prescribed in the said adjective code.

 The objectives of the study are to identify which procedural and structural principles that govern the oral trial are violated with the powers of intervention of the judge of judgment within the framework of the Code of Criminal Procedure of 2004; analyze the concept and attributions of being the impa

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-07

Issue

Vol. 34 No. 2 (2017)

Section

Artículos

License

Los autores que publican en esta revista están de acuerdo con los siguientes términos:

  • Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y garantizan a la revista el derecho de ser la primera publicación del trabajo al igual que licenciado bajo una Creative Commons Attribution que permite a otros compartir el trabajo con un reconocimiento de la autoría del trabajo inicial en esta revista.