APPROXIMATIONS ON THE RIGHT TO EXAMINE AND CROSS-EXAMINE: THE USE OF SUGGESTIVE QUESTIONS IN THE ORAL PROCEEDINGS
Abstract
This paper shows that judges often impose limitations on the use of leading questions in cross-examination during oral trials. In this sense, considering that conceptual and substantiation gaps have an unquestionable impact on the protection of human rights, the authors specify in this documentary research the inherent aspects of the concept and foundation of the right to examine and cross-examine to prevent the vagueness of these elements from causing this right to be unprotected.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Karen Dalina García Curiel, Claudio Renato Sotelo Torres, Benji Espinoza Ramos, Sayuri Sánchez Chávez
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Los autores que publican en esta revista están de acuerdo con los siguientes términos:
- Los autores conservan los derechos de autor y garantizan a la revista el derecho de ser la primera publicación del trabajo al igual que licenciado bajo una Creative Commons Attribution que permite a otros compartir el trabajo con un reconocimiento de la autoría del trabajo inicial en esta revista.
