Comparative study between chlorhexidine and sodium hypochlorite as disinfectant solutions in endodontic practice, review
Keywords:
Chlorhexidine, sodium hypochlorite, endodonticsAbstract
The success of endodontic treatments depends both on a good conformation of the root canals and on the correct disinfection of the pulp space, since the organisms that live in the walls of the root canals can survive as monocultures. Mechanics of lipopolysaccharides is the use of irrigators such as sodium hypochlorite which is one of the most widely used irrigators for the disinfection of root canals as it allows us to dissolve organic tissues in addition to their strong antimicrobial activity, chlorhexidine that has biocompatible characteristics in addition to Two characteristics useful at the time of disinfection of the root canal, such as sustainability and its antimicrobial action or ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), which has chelating characteristics that allow the elimination of the smear layer or dentin barrel product of mechanical instrumentation Of the root canals as well as favoring the action of other irrigators to reach the dentinal tubules and their ramifications.Downloads
References
Liu Y, Guo L, Li Y, Guo X, Wang B, Wu L. In vitro comparison of antimicrobial effectiveness of QMix and other final irrigants in human root canals. Sci Rep. 2015; 5: 17823.
Samiei M, Shahi S,Ardalan-Abdollahi A, Eskandarinezhad M, Negahdari R, Pakseresht Z. The Antibacterial Efficacy of Photo-Activated Disinfection, Chlorhexidine and Sodium Hypochlorite in Infected Root Canals: An in vitro study. Iran Endod J. 2016; 11(3):179–183.
Rico-Romano C,Zubizarreta-Macho A, BaqueroArtigao M, Mena-Álvarez J. An analysis in vivo of intracanal bacterial load before and after chemomechanical preparation: A comparative analysis of two irrigants and two activation techniques. J ClinExp Dent. 2016;8(1):e9–e13.
Karale R, Odebra KM, Srirekhaet A, Champa C, Shetty A, Pushpalathaet al.Effect of dentin on the antimicrobial efficacy of 3% sodium hypochlorite, 2% chlorhexidine, 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, and 18% etidronic acid on Candida albicans: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2016;19:455-60. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.190023.
Luddin N, Ahmed HMA. The antibacterial activity of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis: A review on agar diffusion and direct contact methods. J Conservative Dentistry. 2013; 16(1):9-16.
Da Silva EJNL, Monteiro MR, Belladonna FG, Almeida JF, De-Deus G, Neves AA. Postoperative Pain after Foraminal Instrumentation with a Reciprocating System and Different Irrigating Solutions. Braz Dent J. 2015; 26(3): 216-221.
Valera MC, Cardoso FGR, Chung A, Xavier ACC, Figueiredo MD, Martinho FC, Palo RM. Comparison of Different Irrigants in the Removal of Endotoxins and Cultivable Microorganisms from Infected Root Canals. The Scientific world Journal 2015. Article ID 125636: 1- 6
Gonçalves LS, Rodrigues RCV, Andrade Junior CV, Soares RG, Vettore MV. The Effect of Sodium Hypochlorite and Chlorhexidine as Irrigant Solutions for Root Canal Disinfection: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials. Journal of Endodontics 2016. 42 (4):527-532.
Shenoy A, Bolla N, Sayish, Sarath RK, Sunil-Ram CH, Sumlatha. Assessment of precipitate formation on interaction of irrigants used in different combinations: an in vitro study. Indian J Dent Res. 2013; 24:451-455. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.118392.
Krishnamma S, Peedikayil F, Aman S, Tomy N, Pulickal-Mariodan J. Comparative Evaluation of Antimicrobial Activity of QMiX, 2.5% Sodium Hypochlorite, 2% Chlorhexidine, Guava Leaf Extract and Aloevera Extract Against Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans – An in-vitro Study. J ClinDiagn Res. 2016; 10 (5):ZC20–ZC23.
Goztas Z, Onat H, Tosun G, Sener Y, Huseyin H. Antimicrobial effect of ozonated water, sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidinegluconate in primary molar root canals. Eur J Dent. 2014;8(4):469–474.
Ashofteh K, Sohrabi K, Iranparvar K, Chiniforush N. In vitro comparison of the antibacterial effect of three intracanalirrigants and diode laser on root canals infected with Enterococcus faecalis. Iran J Microbiol. 2014; 6(1):26–30.
Elakanti S, Cherukuri G, Rao V, Chandrasekhar V, Rao A, Tummala M. Comparative evaluation of antimicrobial efficacy of QMix™ 2 in 1, sodium hypochlorite, and chlorhexidine against Enterococcus faecalis and Candida albicans. J Conserv Dent. 2015; 18(2):128–131.
Vaziri S, Kangarlou A, Shahbazi R, Nazari-Nasab A, Naseri M. Comparison of the bactericidal efficacy of photodynamic therapy, 2.5% sodium hypochlorite, and 2% chlorhexidine against Enterococcousfaecalis in root canals; an in vitro study. Dent Res J. 2012; 9(5):613–618.
Mollashahi NF, Bokaeian M, Mollashahir LF, Afrougheh A. Antifungal Efficacy of Green Tea Extract against Candida Albicans Biofilm on Tooth Substrate. J Dentistry, Tehran University of Medical Sciences2015; 12(8):592-598.
Karale R, Odedra KM, Srirekha A, Champa C, Shetty A, Pushpalatha S, et al.Effect of dentin on the antimicrobial efficacy of 3% sodium hypochlorite, 2% chlorhexidine, 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, and 18% etidronic acid on Candida albicans: An in vitro study. J Conserv Dent. 2016; 19(5):455-60. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.190023.
Rôças IN, Provenzano JC, Neves MA, Siqueira JF Jr. Disinfecting Effects of Rotary Instrumentation with Either 2.5% Sodium Hypochlorite or 2% Chlorhexidine as the Main Irrigant: A Randomized Clinical Study. J Endod. 2016 Jun; 42(6):943-7. doi: 10.1016
Samiei M, Shahi S, Abdollahi AA, Eskandarinezhad M, Negahdari R, Pakseresht Z. La Eficacia antibacteriana de Activado-Foto Desinfección, clorhexidina y el hipoclorito de sodio en infectados Tratamientos de conducto: Estudio in vitro. Irán Endod J. 2016;11(3):179-83.
Agrawal V, Rao MR, Dhingra K, Gopal VR, Mohapatra A, Mohapatra A. Una comparación in vitro de effcacy antimicrobiana de tres irrigantes- Biopure conducto radicular MTAD, 2% de clorhexidina gluconato y 5,25% de hipoclorito de sodio como un enjuague final contra E. faecalis.J ContempDentPract. 2013; 14(5):842-7.
Ercan E, Ozekinci T, atakul F, Gül K.La actividad antibacteriana de 2% de clorhexidina gluconato y 5,25% de hipoclorito de sodio en canal de la raíz infectada: estudio in vivo. J Endod. 2004; 30(2):84-7.
Magro, MG, Kuga MC, Aranda- Garcia AJ, ChávezAndrade GM, Faria G, Keine KC, Só VR. Effectiveness of several solutions to prevent the formation of precipitate due to the interaction between sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine and its effect on bond strebht of an epoxy- based sealer. International Endodontics Journal, 2014 pg. 1- 6.
Kolosowski KP, Sodhi RNS, Anil Kisken, Basrani BR. Qualitative analysis of precipitate formation on the surface and in the tubules of dentin irrigated with sodium hypochlorite and a final rinse of chlorhexidine or QMIX. JOE. 2014. 40(12):2036-2040.
Orban EO, Irmak O, Hur D, Yaman BC, Karabucak B. Does para-chloroaniline really form after mixing sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine? JOE. 2016, 42(3): 455- 459
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
- Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
- Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) posterior al proceso de aprobación del manuscrito, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada.
