Tomographic evaluation of dehyscences and fenestrations produced by post orthodontic patients. A review of literature

Authors

  • Rosa Maria Benza

Keywords:

Dehiscences, Fenestrations, Orthodontic Treatment, Cone Beam Computed Tomography.

Abstract

Dehiscences and fenestrations are commonly observed as a result of a secondary effect in orthodontic treatment. These characteristics are only visualized with high resolution images.  where thickness, depth and height are quantified. In addition, said images are taken by cone bean computed tomography, which is an specific tool to diagnose dehiscences and fenestration, due to its reliability and help in diagnosis of support tissue. The objective is to prevent bone defects after an appropiate treatment. The cone bean computed tomography (CBCT) is a useful tool to determine the prevalence of dehiscence and fenestration in post-orthodontic patients. That is why, the cone bean computer tomography must be included as a diagnostic assistance before the beginning of the orthodontic treatment with the purpose of avoiding bone defects which are caused by orthodontic movements like bucco-lingual displacement, retrusions and intrusions

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Tortolini P, Fernández E. Ortodoncia y periodoncia: Av Odontoestomatol 2011; 27 (4): 197-206.

Sun L, Zhang L, Shen G, Wang B, Fang B. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in detecting alveolar bone dehiscence’s and fenestrations: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015;147(3):313-23.

Sarikaya S, Haydar B, Ciğer S, Ariyürek M. Changes in alveolar bone thickness due to retraction of anterior teeth Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122(1):15-26.

Gambarini G et all. Detection of Bone Defects Using CBCT Exam in an Italian Population: Int J Dent. 2017;2017:7523848. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7523848

Yang Y, Yang H, Pan H, Xu J, Hu T. evaluation and new classification of alveolar bone dehiscense using cone bean computed. Int J Morphol 2015,33(1) : 361-368.

Enhos S, Uysal T, Yagci A, Veli İ, Ucar FI, Ozer T. Dehiscence and fenestration in patients with different vertical growth patterns assessed with cone-beam computed tomography: Angle Orthod 2012;82(5):868-74.

Vierna J.M, Cisneros G, Andrade A, Carrasco R, Vaillard E. Medición del espesor del hueso esponjoso y altura de la cresta alveolar en zona de incisivos inferiores con maloclusión clase III esquelética mediante el uso de tomografía axial computarizada: Rev Tamé 2014; 2 (6):180-183.

Evangelista K, Vasconcelos Kde F, Bumann A, Hirsch E, Nitka M, Silva MA. Dehiscence and fenestration in patients with Class I and Class II Division 1 malocclusion assessed with cone-beam computed tomography: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;138(2):133.

Halazonetis DJ. Cone-beam computed tomography is not the imaging technique of choice for comprehensive orthodontic assessment: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2012;141(4):403, 405- 407.

De Santana T, De Carvalho R, Arias A, de OliveiraE, Frazao M, Amorin A. El Uso de la tomografía computarizada de haz volumétrico en odontología: Odontol.Clin-Cient. 2010 9(4)303-306.

Jäger F, Mah JK, Bumann A. Peridental bone changes after orthodontic tooth movement with fixed appliances: A cone-beam computed tomographic study: Angle Orthod. 2017;87(5):672-680.

Roque G, Meneses A, Bóscolo F, De Almeida S, Haiter F. La tomografía computarizada cone beam en la ortodoncia, ortopedia facial y funcional : Rev Estomatol Herediana 2015;25(1):60-77.

Vaquero P, Perea B, Labajo E, Santiago A, García F. Reabsorción radicular durante el tratamiento ortodóncico: causas y recomendaciones de actuación: Científica Dental 8 (1) 61-70.

Fuhrmann R. Three-dimensional interpretation of alveolar bone dehiscences: an anatomical-

radiological study. Part I. J Orofac Orthop. 1996; 57:62–74.

Grünheid T, Kirk DC, Larson BE. The effect of root and bone visualization on perceptions of the quality of orthodontic treatment simulations: Angle orthod 2017;87(3):384-390.

Ising N, Kim KB, Araujo E, Buschang P. Evaluation of dehiscences using cone beam computed tomography: Angle Orthod 2012;82(1):122-30.

Guo Q, Zhang S, Liu H, Wang H, Wei F, Tao L, Wang N, Liu D. Three-dimensional evaluation of upper anterior alveolar bone dehiscence after incisor retraction and intrusion in adult patients with bimaxillary protrusion malocclusion: Biomed & Biotechnol2011 12(12):990-997.

Danz JC, Dalstra M, Bosshardt DD, Katsaros C, Stavropoulos A. A rat model for orthodontic translational expansive tooth movement: Orthod Craniofac Res 2013;16(4):223-33.

Ren Y, Maltha JC, Kuijpers-Jagtman Optimum force magnitude for orthodontic tooth movement: a systematic literature review: Angle Orthod AM, 2003;73(1):86-92.

Wu J, Liu Y, Peng W, Dong h, Zhang J. A biomechanical case study on the optimal orthodontic force on the maxillary canine tooth based on finite element analysis: Biomed & Biotechnol 2018; 19(7):535-546.

Jati AS Furquim LZ, Consolaro A. Gingival recession: its causes and types, and the importance of orthodontic treatment: Dental Press J Orthod 2016;21(3):18-29.

Hyo A, Moon,S, Beak S. Morphometric Evaluation of Changes in the alveolar bone and roots of the maxilar anterior teeth before and after in masse retracting use cone bean computed tomography: Angle Orthod 2013, 83 (2) : 212- 221.

Lee KM, Kim YI, Park SB, Son WS. Alveolar bone loss around lower incisors during surgical orthodontic treatment in mandibular prognathism: Angle Orthod. 2012;82(4):637-44.

Yodthong N, Charoemratrote C, Leethanakul C. Factors related to alveolar bone thickness during upper incisor retraction: Angle Orthod 2013;83(3):394-401.

Scarfe WC, Li Z, Aboelmaaty W, Scott SA, Farman AG. Maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography: essence, elements and steps to interpretation. Aust Dent J. 2012;57 (1):46–60.

Hechler SL. Cone-beam CT: applications in orthodontics: Dent Clin North Am 2008;52(4):809-23.

De Vos W, Casselman J, Swennen GR. Cone-beam computerized tomography (CBCT) imaging of the oral and maxillofacial region: a systematic review of the literature: Int J Oral Maxillofac 2009;38(6):609-25.

Nahm K, Kang J, Moon S, Choi Y, Kook Y, Kim S, Huang J. Alveolar bone, loss around incisors in Class I bidento alveolar protrusion patients a retrospective three- dimensional cone bean: Dental maxillofacial Radiology 2012 (41). 481-488

Kraus CD, Campbell PM, Spears R, Taylor RW, Buschang PH. Bony adaptation after expansion with light-to-moderate continuous forces: Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2014;145(5):655-66.

Garib DG, Yatabe MS, Ozawa TO, da Silva Filho OG. Alveolar bone morphology under the perspective of the computed tomography: Defining the biological limits of tooth movement: Dental Press J Orthod 2010;15(5):192– 205.

Pangrazio V, Jezdimir B, de Deus M, Kulbersh R, Wine P, Kaczynski R. CBCT assessment of alveolar buccal bone level after RME: Angle Orthod 2013;83(1):110-6.

Renkema A, Navratilova Z, Mazurova K, Katsaros K, Fudale P. Gingival labial recessions and the post- treatment proclination of mandibular incisors: Eur J Orthod. 2015;37(5):508-13.

Puigdollers A, De la Iglesia F. Movimiento dental. Efectos de la fuerza y reacción periodontal: Rev Esp Ortod 2004; 34:249-54.

Van Vlijmen O, Kuijpers M, Bergé S, Schols J, Maal T, Breuning H, Kuijpers A. Evidence supporting the use of cone-beam computed tomography in orthodontics: J Am Dent Assoc 2012;143(3):241-52.

Published

2019-10-06

Issue

Section

Artículos de revisión / Reviews

How to Cite

Tomographic evaluation of dehyscences and fenestrations produced by post orthodontic patients. A review of literature. (2019). Revista KIRU ISSN (Impreso): 1812 - 7886 ISSN (Digital): 2410-2717, 16(4). https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/Rev-Kiru0/article/view/1781

Similar Articles

1-10 of 142

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.