Comparison of the bond strength between a hybrid ceramic and a conventional adhesive vs one based on 10 MDP

Authors

  • Marcelo Cascante Calderón Central University of Ecuador a b c Dentist
  • David Barros Pilamunga Central University of Ecuador
  • Inés María Villacís Altamirano Central University of Ecuador

Keywords:

Dental Adhesion, Ceramic, Universal Adhesive, Microshear Bond Strength.

Abstract

 

 

 

The constant evolution of dental ceramics has led to the appearance of hybrid ceramics or also called PICN. However, these new materials require new adhesives and cementation techniques. Materials and Methods: Five VITA ENAMIC blocks were sectioned into sheets (12 x 14 x 1.5 mm), and their surfaces were treated by acid etching and sandblasting (50 µ Al2O4), then randomly divided into two groups according to the type of adhesive: conventional adhesive group (GAC, n = 30) and universal adhesive group (GAU, n = 30). In addition to this, 60 microtubes were made with resin; each of them was cemented with the same cement, on each of the ceramic sheets. After this procedure, they were stored in water at 37ºC for 24 hours. Each microtube was then peeled off by micro-shearing. And the bond strength (RU) was measured in MPa. Statistical analysis was performed with a Student's t test. Statistical significance was 0.05 and confidence was 95%. Results: The RU of the universal adhesive (36.94 MPa) were higher than the conventional one (32.76 MPa). Student's t showed that there was a difference between the groups. p = 0.009 Conclusions: RU on hybrid ceramic was better when the universal adhesive was used. Attempting to use a conventional adhesive plus a previously applied silane did not result in an improvement in bond strengths.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Marcelo Cascante Calderón, Central University of Ecuador a b c Dentist
    Doctor of Dentistry
  • David Barros Pilamunga, Central University of Ecuador
    Student in Dentistry
  • Inés María Villacís Altamirano, Central University of Ecuador
    Dentist

References

Sen N, Us YO. Mechanical and optical properties of monolithic CAD-CAM restorative materials. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2018;119(4):593-9.

Kaur G, Kumar V, Baino F, Mauro JC, Pickrell G, Evans I, et al. Mechanical properties of bioactive glasses, ceramics, glass-ceramics and composites: State-of-the-art review and future challenges. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2019;104:109895.

Thomaidis S, Kakaboura A, Mueller WD, Zinelis S. Mechanical properties of contemporary composite resins and their interrelations. Dent Mater. 2013;29(8):e132-41.

Coldea A, Swain MV, Thiel N. Mechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network materials. Dental Materials. 2013;29(4):419-26.

Alzraikat H, Burrow MF, Maghaireh GA, Taha NA. Nanofilled Resin Composite Properties and Clinical Performance: A Review. Oper Dent. 2018;43(4):E173-e90.

Della Bona A, Corazza PH, Zhang Y. Characterization of a polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network material. Dent Mater. 2014;30(5):564-9.

Yin R, Kim YK, Jang YS, Lee JJ, Lee MH, Bae TS. Comparative evaluation of the mechanical properties of CAD/CAM dental blocks. Odontology. 2019;107(3):360-7.

Yin R, Kim Y-K, Jang Y-S, Lee J-J, Lee M-H, Bae T-S. Comparative evaluation of the mechanical properties of CAD/CAM dental blocks. Odontology. 2019;107(3):360-7.

Frankenbergera R, Hartmannb V, Krechc M, Krämerd N, Reiche S, Braunf A, et al. Adhesive luting of new CAD/CAM materials Adhäsive Befestigung neuer CAD/CAM-Materialien. International journal of computerized dentistry. 2015;18(1):9-20.

Preis V, Behr M, Handel G, Schneider-Feyrer S, Hahnel S, Rosentritt M. Wear performance of dental ceramics after grinding and polishing treatments. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials. 2012;10:13-22.

Matzinger M, Hahnel S, Preis V, Rosentritt M. Polishing effects and wear performance of chairside CAD/CAM materials. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(2):725-37.

Chen B, Lu Z, Meng H, Chen Y, Yang L, Zhang H, et al. Effectiveness of pre-silanization in improving bond performance of universal adhesives or self-adhesive resin cements to silica-based ceramics: Chemical and in vitro evidences. Dent Mater. 2019;35(4):543-53.

Maruo Y, Nishigawa G, Yoshihara K, Minagi S, Matsumoto T, Irie M. Does 8-methacryloxyoctyl trimethoxy silane (8-MOTS) improve initial bond strength on lithium disilicate glass ceramic? Dental Materials. 2017;33(3):e95-e100.

Yao C, Yang H, Yu J, Zhang L, Zhu Y, Huang C. High bond durability of universal adhesives on glass ceramics facilitated by silane pretreatment. Operative dentistry. 2018;43(6):602-12.

Matinlinna JP, Lung CYK, Tsoi JKH. Silane adhesion mechanism in dental applications and surface treatments: A review. Dental Materials. 2018;34(1):13-28.

Dimitriadi M, Panagiotopoulou A, Pelecanou M, Yannakopoulou K, Eliades G. Stability and reactivity of γ-ΜPTMS silane in some commercial primer and adhesive formulations. Dental Materials. 2018;34(8):1089-101.

Prado M, Prochnow C, Marchionatti AME, Baldissara P, Valandro LF, Wandscher VF. Ceramic Surface Treatment with a Single-component Primer: Resin Adhesion to Glass Ceramics. J Adhes Dent. 2018;20(2):99-105.

Yavuz T, Eraslan O. The effect of silane applied to glass ceramics on surface structure and bonding strength at different temperatures. J Adv Prosthodont. 2016;8(2):75-84.

Murillo-Gómez F, Rueggeberg FA, De Goes MF. Short- and Long-Term Bond Strength Between Resin Cement and Glass-Ceramic Using a Silane-Containing Universal Adhesive. Oper Dent. 2017;42(5):514-25.

Pinto GBB. Avaliação de diferentes métodos de aplicação do silano na resistência de união adesiva a cerâmicas vítreas. 2014.

de Carvalho RF, Cotes C, Kimpara ET, Leite FP, Özcan M. Heat treatment of pre-hydrolyzed silane increases adhesion of phosphate monomer-based resin cement to glass ceramic. Braz Dent J. 2015;26(1):44-9.

Awad MM, Albedaiwi L, Almahdy A, Khan R, Silikas N, Hatamleh MM, et al. Effect of universal adhesives on microtensile bond strength to1. Sen N, Us YO. Mechanical and optical properties of monolithic CAD-CAM restorative materials. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2018;119(4):593-9.

Kaur G, Kumar V, Baino F, Mauro JC, Pickrell G, Evans I, et al. Mechanical properties of bioactive glasses, ceramics, glass-ceramics and composites: State-of-the-art review and future challenges. Materials Science and Engineering: C. 2019;104:109895.

Thomaidis S, Kakaboura A, Mueller WD, Zinelis S. Mechanical properties of contemporary composite resins and their interrelations. Dent Mater. 2013;29(8):e132-41.

Coldea A, Swain MV, Thiel N. Mechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network materials. Dental Materials. 2013;29(4):419-26.

Alzraikat H, Burrow MF, Maghaireh GA, Taha NA. Nanofilled Resin Composite Properties and Clinical Performance: A Review. Oper Dent. 2018;43(4):E173-e90.

Della Bona A, Corazza PH, Zhang Y. Characterization of a polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network material. Dent Mater. 2014;30(5):564-9.

Yin R, Kim YK, Jang YS, Lee JJ, Lee MH, Bae TS. Comparative evaluation of the mechanical properties of CAD/CAM dental blocks. Odontology. 2019;107(3):360-7.

Yin R, Kim Y-K, Jang Y-S, Lee J-J, Lee M-H, Bae T-S. Comparative evaluation of the mechanical properties of CAD/CAM dental blocks. Odontology. 2019;107(3):360-7.

Frankenbergera R, Hartmannb V, Krechc M, Krämerd N, Reiche S, Braunf A, et al. Adhesive luting of new CAD/CAM materials Adhäsive Befestigung neuer CAD/CAM-Materialien. International journal of computerized dentistry. 2015;18(1):9-20.

Preis V, Behr M, Handel G, Schneider-Feyrer S, Hahnel S, Rosentritt M. Wear performance of dental ceramics after grinding and polishing treatments. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials. 2012;10:13-22.

Matzinger M, Hahnel S, Preis V, Rosentritt M. Polishing effects and wear performance of chairside CAD/CAM materials. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23(2):725-37.

Chen B, Lu Z, Meng H, Chen Y, Yang L, Zhang H, et al. Effectiveness of pre-silanization in improving bond performance of universal adhesives or self-adhesive resin cements to silica-based ceramics: Chemical and in vitro evidences. Dent Mater. 2019;35(4):543-53.

Maruo Y, Nishigawa G, Yoshihara K, Minagi S, Matsumoto T, Irie M. Does 8-methacryloxyoctyl trimethoxy silane (8-MOTS) improve initial bond strength on lithium disilicate glass ceramic? Dental Materials. 2017;33(3):e95-e100.

Yao C, Yang H, Yu J, Zhang L, Zhu Y, Huang C. High bond durability of universal adhesives on glass ceramics facilitated by silane pretreatment. Operative dentistry. 2018;43(6):602-12.

Matinlinna JP, Lung CYK, Tsoi JKH. Silane adhesion mechanism in dental applications and surface treatments: A review. Dental Materials. 2018;34(1):13-28.

Dimitriadi M, Panagiotopoulou A, Pelecanou M, Yannakopoulou K, Eliades G. Stability and reactivity of γ-ΜPTMS silane in some commercial primer and adhesive formulations. Dental Materials. 2018;34(8):1089-101.

Prado M, Prochnow C, Marchionatti AME, Baldissara P, Valandro LF, Wandscher VF. Ceramic Surface Treatment with a Single-component Primer: Resin Adhesion to Glass Ceramics. J Adhes Dent. 2018;20(2):99-105.

Yavuz T, Eraslan O. The effect of silane applied to glass ceramics on surface structure and bonding strength at different temperatures. J Adv Prosthodont. 2016;8(2):75-84.

Murillo-Gómez F, Rueggeberg FA, De Goes MF. Short- and Long-Term Bond Strength Between Resin Cement and Glass-Ceramic Using a Silane-Containing Universal Adhesive. Oper Dent. 2017;42(5):514-25.

Pinto GBB. Avaliação de diferentes métodos de aplicação do silano na resistência de união adesiva a cerâmicas vítreas. 2014.

de Carvalho RF, Cotes C, Kimpara ET, Leite FP, Özcan M. Heat treatment of pre-hydrolyzed silane increases adhesion of phosphate monomer-based resin cement to glass ceramic. Braz Dent J. 2015;26(1):44-9.

Awad MM, Albedaiwi L, Almahdy A, Khan R, Silikas N, Hatamleh MM, et al. Effect of universal adhesives on microtensile bond strength to hybrid ceramic. BMC oral health. 2019;19(1):178.

Kömürcüoğlu MB, Sağırkaya E, Tulga A. Influence of different surface treatments on bond strength of novel CAD/CAM restorative materials to resin cement. The journal of advanced prosthodontics. 2017;9(6):439-46.

Shibuya K, Ohara N, Ono S, Matsuzaki K, Yoshiyama M. Influence of 10-MDP concentration on the adhesion and physical properties of self-adhesive resin cements. Restor Dent Endod. 2019;44(4):e45.

Valente F, Mavriqi L, Traini T. Effects of 10-MDP Based Primer on Shear Bond Strength between Zirconia and New Experimental Resin Cement. Materials (Basel, Switzerland). 2020;13(1).

Yavuz T, Özyılmaz Ö Y, Dilber E, Tobi ES, Kiliç H. Effect of Different Surface Treatments on Porcelain-Resin Bond Strength. J Prosthodont. 2017;26(5):446-54.

Moravej-Salehi E, Moravej-Salehi E, Valian A. Surface topography and bond strengths of feldspathic porcelain prepared using various sandblasting pressures. J Investig Clin Dent. 2016;7(4):347-54.

Nakabayashi N, Pashley D. Hybridization of dental hard tissues Quintessence Publishing Co. Tokio; 1998.

Demirtag Z, Culhaoglu A. Surface roughness of ceramic-resin composites after femtosecond laser irradiation, sandblasting or acid etching and their bond strength with and without silanization to a resin cement. Operative dentistry. 2019;44(2):156-67.

Sano H, Shono T, Sonoda H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Carvalho R, et al. Relationship between surface area for adhesion and tensile bond strength—evaluation of a micro-tensile bond test. Dental Materials. 1994;10(4):236-40.

Published

2022-10-31

Issue

Section

Artículos Originales/ Original articles

How to Cite

1.
Cascante Calderón M, Barros Pilamunga D, Villacís Altamirano IM. Comparison of the bond strength between a hybrid ceramic and a conventional adhesive vs one based on 10 MDP. kiru [Internet]. 2022 Oct. 31 [cited 2026 Aug. 31];19(2). Available from: https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/Rev-Kiru0/article/view/2472

Similar Articles

1-10 of 99

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.