Comparison between conventional and digital dental impressions in pediatric patients: a narrative review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24265/kiru.2024.v21n2.05Keywords:
Dental Impressions Techniques; CAD-CAM; Pediatric dentistryAbstract
In the following narrative review, original articles and review articles were collected from Pubmed, LILACS, ScienceDirect, SciELO, Scopus, and Google Scholar in the period between January 2013 and August 2023. Were selected 32 open access type published articles, in Spanish and English. Digital and conventional impressions in children are compared according to time, precision, handling, comfort, and acceptance. According to the evaluation criteria, it is concluded from the literature that digital impressions are the preferred choice in children. Therefore, taking digital impressions is favorable in terms of time, precision, handling, comfort and acceptance over conventional impressions in children.
Downloads
References
Schott TC, Arsalan R, Weimer K. Students’ perspectives on the use of digital versus conventional dental impression techniques in orthodontics. BMC Med Educ. 2019;19(1):1–6.
Gerardo D, Vaca C, Leonardo J, Ortiz A. una revisión de literatura Accuracy of intraoral impressions : a literature review Introducción La impresión es un procedimiento que transfiere la situación intraoral del paciente a un modelo de yeso o a un Materiales y métodos Esta revisión sistemática u. 2021;23:1–8.
Saccomanno S, Saran S, Vanella V, Mastrapasqua RF, Raffaelli L, Levrini L. The Potential of Digital Impression in Orthodontics. Dent J. 2022;10(8):1–9.
Mangano F, Gandolfi A, Luongo G, Logozzo S. Intraoral scanners in dentistry: A review of the current literature. BMC Oral Health. 2017;17(1):1–11.
López Hernández L de los M, Rodríguez Castillo D, Espinosa Tejeda N de las M. Materiales de Impresion de uso estomatológico. Rev 16 abril. 2018;57(267):64– 72.
Mangano A, Beretta M, Luongo G, Mangano C, Mangano
F. Conventional Vs Digital Impressions: Acceptability, Treatment Comfort and Stress Among Young Orthodontic Patients. Open Dent J. 2018;12(1):118–24.
Villavicencio-Caparó E, Chiriboga-Guartambel P, Vásquez-Montoya J, Montesinos- Rojas J, Andrade- Molina MC. Tasa de uso de materiales e insumos dentales. Rev Estomatológica Hered. 2018;28(1):29.
Silva FCFA e, Souza LC de, Rodrigues NS, Cunha DA, Apolonio FM, Saboia V de PA. Técnica de moldagem modificada usando silicona de adição. Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent. 2016;70(4):364–8.
Carvalho TF, Lima JFM, de-Matos JDM, Lopes G da RS, Vasconcelos JEL de, Zogheib LV, et al. Evaluation of the Accuracy of Conventional and Digital Methods of Obtaining Dental Impressions. Int J Odontostomatol. 2018;12(4):368–75.
Torrecilla R, Hierrezuelo L, Rodriguez M. Hidrocoloide irreversible o alginato como material de impresión de uso estomatológico. Rev Estud HOLCIEN. 2021;2(1):1–20.
Bandoli Monteiro J, Cláudio Contreras LP, Damasceno Cunha T, Vasconcelos de Castro Leite LP, De Morais Vieira J, De Oliveira Salgado I. Precisión dimensional de una silicona de condensación: comparación del tiempo de almacenamiento y el método de medición. Odontol Sanmarquina. 2018;21(4):288.
Glisic O, Hoejbjerre L, Sonnesen L. A comparison of patient experience, chair-side time, accuracy of dental arch measurements and costs of acquisition of dental models. Angle Orthod. 2019;89(6):868–75.
Dalai J, Sisodia V. Colors and Flavors: Adding Joy to Pediatric Dentistry–A Cross-sectional Study. J Contemp Dent. 2018;8(2):63–9.
Debs NN, Aboujaoude S. Effectiveness of intellectual distraction on gagging and anxiety management in children: A prospective clinical study. J Int Soc Prev Communit Dent. 2017;7(6):315–20.
Abdelraouf RM, Bayoumi RE, Hamdy TM. Effect of powder/water ratio variation on viscosity, tear strength and detail reproduction of dental alginate impression material (In vitro and clinical study). Polymers (Basel). 2021;13(17).
Al Qahtani MA, Alrefaie M, Altamimi A, Aljowyed I, Al Qahtani MA, AlQahtani A, et al. Evaluation of pre-alginate impression preparation methods in the surface accuracy of dental cast. Saudi Dent J. 2019;31(4):451–6. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj. 2019.04.005
Tango RN, Souza DLA, da Silva LH, Sato TDP, Borges ALS, Carvalho PCK de. Effect of the mixing method on the dimensional stability of dental stones. Brazilian Dent Sci. 2018;21(4):432–6.
Bosoni C, Nieri M, Franceschi D, Souki BQ, Franchi L, Giuntini V. Comparison between digital and conventional impression techniques in children on preference, time and comfort: A crossover randomized controlled trial. Orthod Craniofacial Res. 2023;26(4):585–90.
Gautam N, Ahmed R, Sharma S, Madineni PK, Hasan
S. A comparative study to evaluate the accuracy of various spacer thickness for polyvinyl siloxane putty- wash impression techniques: An in vitro study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2020;13(5):536–42.
Jajee M, Patil VS, Patil BC, Halkai SR, Kadammanavar J, Fatima M. Comparative evaluation of accuracy, time and patient acceptance between
intraoral scanner and conventional alginate impression technique – An invivo study. IP Indian J Orthod Dentofac Res. 2023;9(3):183–91.
Figueroa Suárez Juan Alberto, Arpi Barrera Luis Miguel, Tigua Baque Domenica Ahyly, Rosero Arteaga Paola. Innovación en salud bucodental: Impresión en 3D en la Unidad Odontológica Clinident. Dominio las Ciencias. 2019;5(4):61–79.
Kihara H, Hatakeyama W, Komine F, Takafuji K, Takahashi T, Yokota J, et al. Accuracy and practicality of intraoral scanner in dentistry: A literature review. J Prosthodont Res. 2020 Apr 1;64(2):109–13.
AFRASHTEHFAR KI, ALNAKEB NA, ASSERY MKM. Accuracy of Intraoral Scanners Versus Traditional Impressions: a Rapid Umbrella Review. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2022;22(3):1–8.
Khan M. Modern digital pediatric dentistry with the advent of intraoral sensors, computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing, and three- dimensional printing technologies: A comprehensive review. Niger Postgrad Med J. 2015;22(4):195–201.
González-Quintanilla D, Zamorano JP, Mella E, Pinto N, Brisso J, Rodriguez N, et al. Autotrasplante Dental Utilizando Simulación Virtual y un Prototipo de Modelo de Impresión 3D. Int J Odontostomatol. 2021;15(1):271–7.
Rivera C, Aguirre E, Medrano J, Rojas P. Tecnología CAD/CAM en la consulta dental CAD / CAM technology in the dental office CAD / CAM no consultório odontológico. Dominio las Ciencias. 2017;3(2):799–821.
da Silva-Dantas L, Yamashita A, Sigua-Rodriguez E, Chicarelli M, Vessoni-Iwak i L, Filho L. Exactitud de las mediciones lineales de modelos dentales digitalizados a través de escáner 3D y tomografía computarizada de haz cónico en comparación con modelos de yeso. Rev CES Odont. 2019;32(2):7–16.
Aldana Sepulveda H, Garzón Rayo H. Toma de impresiones en protesis fija. Implicaciones periodontales. Av Odontoestomatol. 2014;32(2):1–13.
Bahammam HA. Conventional vs. Digital Impression: Comfort Level, Preferences, and Acceptance of Treatment Time among Orthodontic Patients. Open Dent J. 2022;16(1):1–9.
Benitez BK, Brudnicki A, Surowiec Z, Wieprzowski Ł, Rasadurai A, Nalabothu P, et al. Digital impressions from newborns to preschoolers with cleft lip and palate: A two-centers experience. J Plast Reconstr Aesthetic Surg. 2022;75(11):4233–42. doi: 10.1016/j. bjps.2022.08.015
Bahammam HA. Conventional vs. Digital Impression: Comfort Level, Preferences, and Acceptance of Treatment Time among Orthodontic Patients. Open Dent J. 2022;16(1):1–9.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dayana Isabel Montero-Gonzales, Joselyne Silvia Carhuas-Córdova , Delia Luisa Sánchez-Sánchez , Víctor Fernando Lamas-Lara
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
- Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
- Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) posterior al proceso de aprobación del manuscrito, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada.
