Level of surgical complexity in mandibular third molars evaluated by panoramic radiographs in a public hospital in Lima

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24265/kiru.2024.v21n3.02

Keywords:

Third Molar; Oral Surgery; Risk Index

Abstract

Objectives: Determine the level of surgical complexity of mandibular third molars (3MM) evalued by panoramic radiographs (PAN) in a public hospital in Lima and whether it was associated with sex, age, and type of molar tooth. Materials and Methods: The 3MM sample was 289 observed in 266 PAN digital of adults ≥18 years (50.2% men, mean age: 36.44±14.86 years). The eight parameters of the Pernambuco index were: age, body mass index (18.5-24.9 or ≥25), level of the occlusal plane, available retromolar space, angle of impact, root curvature, number of roots and relationship with the 2MM. Statistic analysis was performed with the chi-square, Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Results: The 3MM had a moderate level of surgical complexity (54.7%) followed by mild (40.1%). The majority presented vertical impaction (48.8%), dilaceration (82.7%), two or more roots (58.8%) and contact with the 2MM crown (72.0%). A mild complexity was related to women and a higher age, while a severe level was related to men and a younger age (p=0.01 [sex], p=0.009 [age]). The index was higher in men (14 [IQR=4]) than women (13 [IQR=2]) and was slightly negatively correlated with age (rho=- 0.239). Conclusions: The level of surgical complexity of 3MM of Peruvian adults was moderate, mainly associated with vertical impaction, dilacerated root curvature, a greater number of roots and contact with the crown of the 2MM. The complexity was symmetrical on sides but varied according to sex and age. Greater complexity was observed in men and at younger ages.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Karen Lilibeth Zea Rojas, Universidad Científica del Sur

    Bachiller en odontología

  • Ronald Amasifuen Choquecahuana , Universidad Científica del Sur

    Magister en Docencia e Investigación

References

Pitros P, O’Connor N, Tryfonos A, Lopes V. A systematic review of the complications of high-risk third molar removal and coronectomy: development of a decision tree model and preliminary health economic analysis to assist in treatment planning. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;58(9):16-24.

Farish S, Bouloux G. General technique of third molar removal. Oral Maxillofacial Surg Clin N Am. 2007;19:23-43.

Saputri RI, De Tobel J, Vranckx M, Ockerman A, Van Vlierberghe M, Fieuws S, et al. Is third molar development affected by third molar impaction or impaction-related parameters? Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(12):6681-6693.

Sammartino G, Gasparro R, Marenzi G, Trosino O, Mariniello M, Riccitielo F. Extraction of mandibular third molars: proposal of a new scale of difficulty. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;55(9):952-957.

Marciani R. Complications of Third Molar Surgery and Their Management. Atlas Oral Maxillofacial Surg Clin N Am. 2012;20(2):233-251.

Flores J, Ochoa M, Barraza J, Romero J, Rojas

M. Complicaciones postoperatorias asociadas a la cirugía del tercer molar inferior retenido. Revista ADM. 2015;72(6):314-319.

Sánchez-Torres A, Soler-Capdevila J, Ustrell-Barral M, Gay-Escoda C. Patient, radiological, and operative factors associated with surgical difficulty in the extraction of third molars: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;49(5):655-665.

Baeza S, Cáceres N, González G, Guzmán C, Sepúlveda MP, Valenzuela I. Caracterización de exodoncia de terceros molares. Rev Cient Odontol (Lima). 2021;9(3):075.

Angelakopoulos N, Franco A, Mula AP, Moukarzel M, Sharma S, Balla SB. Effect of impaction on third molar development and age estimation. A study in a Lebanese population. Morphologie. 2023;107(359):100607.

Sifuentes-Cervantes JS, Carrillo-Morales F, Castro- Núñez J, Cunningham LL, Van Sickels JE. Third molar surgery: Past, present, and the future. Oral Surg, Oral Med, Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2021;132(5):523-531.

Rizqiawan A, Lesmaya YD, Rasyida AZ, Amir MS, Ono S, Kamadjaja DB. Postoperative complications of impacted mandibular third molar extraction related to patient’s age and surgical difficulty level: a cross- sectional retrospective Study. Int J Dent. 2022. (3):7239339.

Agrawal A, Yadav A, Chandel S, Singh N, Singhal A. Wisdom Tooth—Complications in Extraction. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014;15(1):34-36.

Fuentes R, Arias A, Borie-Echevarría E. Radiografía panorámica: una herramienta invaluable para el estudio del componente óseo y dental del territorio maxilofacial. Int. J. Morphol. 2021;39(1):268-273.

Patel P, Shah J, Dudhia B, Bharat P, Jani Y, Macwan

R. Comparison of panoramic radiograph and cone beam computed tomography findings for impacted mandibular third molar root and inferior alveolar nerve canal relation. Indian J Dent Res. 2020;31(1):91-102.

Elkhateeb, S. Awad, S. Accuracy of panoramic radiographic predictor signs in the assessment of proximity of impacted third molars with the mandibular canal. J Taibah Univ Medical Sci. 2018;13(3):254-261.

Moreira-Souza L, Butini Oliveira L, Gaêta-Araujo H, Almeida-Marques M, Asprino L, Oenning AC. Comparison of CBCT and panoramic radiography for the assessment of bone loss and root resorption on the second molar associated with third molar impaction: a systematic review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2022;1(3):51.

Santosh P. Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: Review of Literature and a Proposal of a Combined Clinical and Radiological Classification. Ann of Medical and Health Sci Res. 2015; 5(4):229-34.

Park K. Which factors are associated with difficult surgical extraction of impacted lower third molars? J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;42(5):251- 258.

Jeyashree T, Kumar MPS. Evaluation of difficulty index of impacted mandibular third molar extractions. J Adv Pharm Technol Res. 2022;13(1):98-101.

Gbotolorun O, Toy G, Ladipo A. Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty in impacted mandibular third molar extraction. Surgical difficulty in third molar extraction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg

.2007;65(10):1977-83.

De Carvalho RW, do Egito Vasconcelos BC. Is overweight a risk factor for adverse events during removal of impacted lower third molars? ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:589856.

Carvalho RW, do Egito Vasconcelos BC. Assessment of factors associated with surgical difficulty during removal of impacted lower third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011;69(11):2714-21.

Jaroń A, Trybek G. The Pattern of Mandibular Third Molar Impaction and Assessment of Surgery Difficulty: A

RetrospectiveStudyofRadiographsinEastBalticPopulation. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(11):6016.

Chuang SK, Perrott DH, Susarla SM, Dodson TB. Age as a risk factor for third molar surgery complications. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007;65(9):1685-92.

Ye ZX, Qian WH, Wu YB, Yang C. Pathologies associated with the mandibular third molar impaction. Sci Prog. 2021;104(2):368504211013247.

Kumar VR, Yadav P, Kahsu E, Girkar F, Chakraborty

R. Prevalence and Pattern of Mandibular Third Molar Impaction in Eritrean Population: A Retrospective Study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017;18(2):100-106.

De Carvalho R, Vasconcelos B. Pernambuco index: predictability of the complexity of surgery for impacted lower third molars. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2017;47(2):234-240.

Sayed N, Bakathir A, Pasha M, Al-Sudairy S. Complications of third molar extraction a retrospective study from a tertiary healthcare centre in Oman. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2019;19(3):230–235.

Published

2024-07-30

Issue

Section

Artículos Originales/ Original articles

How to Cite

1.
Lilibeth Zea Rojas K, Amasifuen Choquecahuana R. Level of surgical complexity in mandibular third molars evaluated by panoramic radiographs in a public hospital in Lima. kiru [Internet]. 2024 Jul. 30 [cited 2026 Nov. 3];21(3):113-20. Available from: https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/Rev-Kiru0/article/view/2909

Similar Articles

1-10 of 98

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.