Verification of autoclave effectiveness using chemical indicators in a dental environment

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25265/kiru.2024.v21n3.05

Keywords:

Sterilization; Dental Offices; Dental Equipment; Pollution Indicators

Abstract

Objectives: Verify the effectiveness of autoclaves using chemical indicators in the pre-professional clinics of a higher institution. Materials and methods: An observational study was carried out in pre-professional clinics of a higher training institution for dentists in the city of Cuenca, Ecuador. Ninety-four readings with chemical indicators were used in two functional autoclaves distributed among three clinics. The evaluation was based on the 3M® control and chemical integrator 3M® Attest® 1243B, with results classified as “Accepted” or “Rejected.” The indicators were placed in various locations within the autoclaves and monitored for four weeks, at two specific times of the day. Results: Of the 94 chemical indicators used, 63.8% resulted in “Accepted,” evidencing the effectiveness of the sterilization, while 36.2% were classified as “Rejected,” indicating unsatisfactory sterilizations. The distribution of results varied between clinics and according to the location of the indicators within the autoclaves. Conclusions: The study concludes that, although most autoclave sterilization cycles in pre- professional clinics are effective, there is significant room to improve the effectiveness of these procedures. The location of chemical indicators within the autoclave influences sterilization results, suggesting the importance of optimizing instrument placement to ensure uniform and complete sterilization.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Robinson A. Morocho Morocho, Universidad Católica de Cuenca. Cuenca, Ecuador

    Educación superior

  • Jéssica M. Sarmiento Ordóñez, Universidad Católica de Cuenca. Cuenca, Ecuador

    Magister en Microbiología Avanzada

  • Magaly N. Jiménez-Romero, Universidad Católica de Cuenca. Cuenca, Ecuador

    Especialista en ortodoncia

References

Siles-García AA, Alzamora-Cepeda AG, Atoche-Socola KJ, Peña-Soto C, Arriola-Guillén LE. Biosafety for Dental Patients During Dentistry Care After COVID-19: A Review of the Literature. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2021;15(3):e43-8. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2020.252.

Panta G, Richardson AK, Shaw IC, Chambers S, Coope PA. Effectiveness of steam sterilization of reusable medical devices in primary and secondary care public hospitals in Nepal and factors associated with ineffective sterilization: A nation-wide cross-sectional study. PLoS One. 2019;14(11:e0225595):1-14. doi:

1371%2Fjournal.pone.0225595.

Kothekar AT, Kulkarni AP. Basic Principles of Disinfection and Sterilization in Intensive Care and Anesthesia and Their Applications during COVID-19 Pandemic. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2020;24(11):1114-24. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23562.

Sajjanshetty S, Hugar D, Hugar S, Ranjan S, Kadani

M. Decontamination methods used for dental burs - a comparative study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8(6):ZC39-41. doi: 10.7860/jcdr/2014/9314.4488.

Tole H, Hernández P. Procesos de desinfección y esterilización en centros odontológicos, revisión literaria desde el estado del arte del instrumentador quirúrgico. Rev Odontol Latinoam. 2020;12(2):35-45.

Khalil H. Willingness of Saudi dental professionals to treat Hepatitis B virus-infected patients. Niger J Clin Pract. 2015;18(2):247-50. doi: 10.4103/1119- 3077.151053.

Nagao Y, Kimura T, Nagao H. Analysis of hepatitis B and C virus infections amongst members of the Dental National Health Insurance Society in the Oita Prefecture. Biomed Rep. 2021;14(2:23):1-8. doi: 10.3892%2Fbr.2020.1399.

Ata-Ali J, Ata-Ali F, Di-Benedetto N, Bagán L, Bagán JV. Does HIV infection have an impact upon dental implant osseointegration? A systematic review. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2015;20(3):e347-356. doi:10.4317%2Fmedoral.20408.

Fuentes R, Zaror C, Huanquilef M. Legislación y Normas Atingentes a la Atención Odontológica y el COVID-19. Una Perspectiva Desde las Clínicas Universitarias. Int J Odontostomatol. 2020;14(4):481-8. doi: 10.4067/ S0718-381X2020000400481.

Christiani J. Covid-19: una mirada hacia la seguridad del paciente en odontología. Rev Asoc Odontol Argent. 2020 Ago 30;108(2):88-94.

Bustillos W. Importancia de la Bioseguridad en Odontología. Rev.Salud Pública Parag. 2021;11(1):80-6. doi: 10.18004/rspp.2021.junio.80.

Mallick A, Khaliq S, Nasir M, Qureshi R. Practices of sterilization techniques at dental clinics of Karachi, Pakistan. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. 2014;4(1):108-12.

MSP. Bioseguridad para los establecimientos de salud. Quito, Ecuador: Ministerio de Salud Pública del Ecuador; 2016 p. 230.

Rutala W, Gergen M, Sickbert-Bennett E, Weber D. Comparative evaluation of the microbicidal activity of low-temperature sterilization technologies to steam sterilization. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2020;41(4):391-5. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.2

Ahmed H. Methods of Sterilization and Monitoring of Sterilization AcrossSelected Dental Practices in Karachi, Pakistan. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2015;25(10):713-6. doi: 10.2015/JCPSP.713716.

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Summary of Infection Prevention Practices in Dental Settings: Basic Expectations for Safe Care. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S. Dept of Health and Human Services; October 2016.

Garrido García, María, Perea Pérez, Bernardo y Labajo González, Elena (2013). Efectividad y seguridad de los procesos de esterilización en Odontología. Gac Dent. 2013;246:190-198.

Rodríguez-González M, Pérez-González M, Álvarez- Monteagudo C. Efectividad de los integradores químicos en la esterilización por vapor a presión. Investig Medicoquir. 2019;10(2).

Torres Ruilova PE. Verificar la eficacia de los procesos de esterilización. Mediante el uso de indicadores, en consultorios privados de la ciudad de Cuenca [tesis de pregrado]. [Cuenca]: Universidad Católica de Cuenca; 2021. 11 p.

Riofrio Berrú N, Sarmiento-Ordóñez J, Paladines Calle S, Torracchi-Carrasco J. Verification of the Effectiveness of Autoclaves Through Chemical Indicators. Odontol Universitario. 2021;40:1-8. doi: 10.11144/Javeriana.uo40.veac.

Patiño-Marín N, Loyola-Rodríguez JP, Tovar-Reyes LF. Uso y verificación con indicadores biológicos en esterilizadores de cirujanos dentistas de San Luis Potosí, México. Salud Púb México. 2001;43(5):455-8.

Gimenes Corrêa E, Freire de Castilho A, Pereira CV. Indicadores químicos e biológicos da eficácia de esterilização por autoclave ou estufa. Rev odonto ciênc. 2009;24(2):156-60.

Hu T, Huang J, Jiang S, Hu R, Huang Y, Pan W, et al. Improvement and implementation of central sterile supply department training program based on action research. BMC Nursing. 2024;23(184):1-8. doi: 10.1186/ s12912-024-01809-z.

Fast OM, Gebremedhin Teka H, Alemayehu Gebreselassie M, Fast CMD, Fast D, Uzoka FME. The impact of a short-term training program on workers’ sterile processing knowledge and practices in 12 Ethiopian hospitals: A mixed methods study. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(5:e0215643). doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0215643.

Guijarro Bañuelos JM. Verificación de los procesos de esterilización mediante indicadores biológicos en los equipos de consultorios dentales de San Luis Potosí [tesis de maestría]. [San Luis de Potosí]: Benemérita Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí; 2018. 93 p.

Rodziewicz TL, Houseman B, Vaqar S, Hipskind JE.Medical Error Reduction and Prevention. 2024 Feb12. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan.

Kammoun A, Hachicha W, Aljuaid AM. Integrating Quality Tools and Methods to Analyze and Improve a Hospital Sterilization Process. Healthcare. 2021;9(5):1-13. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9050544

Navarrete Llamatumbi, M. (2015). Sistema de registro y control del instrumental esterilizado mediante una aplicación informática en el área de esterilización de la Facultad de Odontología de la Universidad Central del Ecuador [tesis de pregrado]. [Quito]: Universidad Central del Ecuador; 2015. 98 p.

Saporito A, Tassone C, Di Iorio A, Barbieri Saraceno M, Bressan A, Pini R, et al. Six Sigma can significantly reduce costs of poor quality of the surgical instruments sterilization process and improve surgeon and operating room personnel satisfaction. Scientific Reports. 2023;13(14116):1-9. doi: 10.1038/s41598- 023-41393-x

Puttaiah R, Griggs J, D’Onofrio M. A preliminary evaluation of a reusable digital sterilization indicator prototype. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2014 Sep 1;15(5):626-35. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1591.

Published

2024-07-30

Issue

Section

Artículos Originales/ Original articles

How to Cite

1.
Morocho Morocho RA, Sarmiento Ordóñez JM, Jiménez-Romero MN. Verification of autoclave effectiveness using chemical indicators in a dental environment. kiru [Internet]. 2024 Jul. 30 [cited 2026 Sep. 1];21(3):136-41. Available from: https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/Rev-Kiru0/article/view/2912

Similar Articles

1-10 of 89

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.