Biomechanical evaluation of implants with different surfaces: analysis of stability coefficient and removal torque in rabbits

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24265/kiru.2025.v22n2.02

Keywords:

Dental Implants; Denture Retenction; Torque.

Abstract

Objective: Evaluate the biomechanical behavior of three implant brands with different surfaces by comparing stability parameters during placement and removal. Materials and Methods: An experimental study was conducted with 8 rabbits, in which 21 implants from three different brands were placed: ML Implant System®, Roster Dent®, and Biomet 3i® Osseotite. Seven implants of each brand were placed in each femur, and resonance frequency analysis was performed to measure the initial stability coefficient (initial ISQ). At 60 days, the final stability coefficient of the implants was measured. To measure removal torque, the implants were fixed in a press, and a Mark-10 precision digital torque wrench was used. Implants were removed by reverse rotation, recording the peak removal torque value.

Results: Regarding initial-stage stability, the Roster Dent® and ML Implant System® groups showed higher values than the Biomet 3i® group, although differences were not significant (p=0.82). However, the ML Implant System® group showed lower final-stage stability (p=0.04). No statistically significant difference was observed between insertion and removal torque. Intergroup differences in removal torque were also non-significant. Conclusions: The studied implant systems demonstrated similar behavior during biomechanical insertion and removal torque testing. Differences were noted among all brands when comparing initial and final resonance frequency analyses (mechanical stability vs. biological stability). The ML Implant System® group showed a lower ISQ in the final stage.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Arminda Rodríguez, Universidad Católica de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina

    Especialista en Implantología

  • María Cristina Navarro, Universidad Católica de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina

    Especialista en Implantología

  • Juan Carlos Ibañez, Universidad Católica de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina

    Doctor en Odontología, Especialista en Implantología.

  • Miriam Silvina Grenón, Universidad Católica de Córdoba, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina.

    Doctor en Odontología, Especialista en Implantología.

References

Albrektsson T, Johansson C. Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegratión. Eur Spine J. 2001;10(Suppl 2):S96-S101. doi:10.1007/s005860100282.

Chouirfa H, Bouloussa H, Migonney V, Falentin-Daudré C. Review of titanium surface modification techniques and coatings for antibacterial applications. Acta Biomater. 2019 Jan 1; 83:37-54. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.10.036.

Franchi M, Orsini E, Trire A, Quaranta M, Martini D, Piccari GG, et al. Osteogenesis and morphology of the peri-implant bone facing dental implants. Scientific World Journal. 2004 Dec 14;4:1083-95. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2004.211.

Meredith N, Shagaldi F, Alleyne D, Sennerby L, Cawley P. The application of resonance frequency measurements to study the stability of titanium implants during healing in the rabbit tibia. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997 Jun;8(3):234-43. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0501.1997.080310.

Makary C, Rebaudi A, Mokbel N, Naaman N. Peak insertion torque correlated to histologically and clinically evaluated bone density. Implant Dent. 2011 Jun;20(3):182-91. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31821662b9.

Ibáñez MC, Tahhan M, Ibáñez JC. Influencia de la orientación del sensor Osstell ISQ en los valores del coeficiente de estabilidad de los implantes. Rev Asoc Odontol Argent. 2014;102(4):166-171.

Smeets R, Stadlinger B, Schwarz F, Beck-Broichsitter B, Jung O, Precht C, et al. Impact of Dental Implant Surface Modifications on Osseointegration. Biomed Res Int. 2016; 2016:6285620. doi: 10.1155/2016/6285620.

Gallardo S, Ibañez MC, Ibañez JC. Correlation between ISQ and Insertion Torque values using double acid-etched implants. J Osseointegr. 2016;8(3):29-36.

Bustos Malberti S, Correa Patiño D, Crespo I, Juaneda MA, Ibáñez MC, Ibáñez JC. Evaluación de torque de remoción en implantes dentales 3i, B&W y Tree-Oss. Estudio experimental en conejos. Rev Asoc Odontol Argent. 2016;104:150-159.

ML Implant System [Internet]. [citado el 15 de marzo del 2024]. Disponible en: https://www.mlimplantsystem.com.ar

Roster Dent. Sistemas de implantes dentales. [Internet]. [citado el 15 de marzo del 2024]. Disponible en: https://www.rosterdent.com.ar

Product catalog for site preparation & surgical technologies. [Internet]. [citado el 15 de marzo del 2024]. Disponible en: https://www.biomet3i.cz

Sezin M, Croharé L, Ibañez JC. Microscopic study of surface microtopographic characteristics of dental implants. Open Dent J. 2016;10:139-47. doi:10.2174/1874210601610010139.

Herrero-Climent M, Falcão A, López-Jarana P, Díaz-Castro CM, Ríos-Carrasco B, Ríos-Santos JV. In vitro comparative analysis of two resonance frequency measurement devices: Osstell implant stability coefficient and Penguin resonance frequency analysis. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Dec;21(6):1124-1131. doi: 10.1111/cid.12868.

Jaramillo R, Santos R, Lázaro P, Romero M, Rios-Santos JV, Bullón P. Comparative analysis of 2 resonance frequency measurement devices: Osstell Mentor and Osstell ISQ. Implant Dent. 2014 Jun;23(3):351-6. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000072.

Jimbo R, Fernandez-Rodriguez J, Sul YT, Johansson CB. Principal component analysis: a novel analysis to evaluate the characteristics of osseointegration of different implant surfaces. Implant Dent. 2011 Oct;20(5):364-8. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31822b9c39.

Leocádio ACS, Júnior MS, Oliveira GJPL, Pinto GDCS, Faeda RS, Padovan LEM, et al. Evaluation of Implants with Different Macrostructures in Type I Bone-Pre-Clinical Study in Rabbits. 2020;13(7):1521. doi:10.3390/ma13071521.

Koh JW, Yang JH, Han JS, Lee JB, Kim SH. Biomechanical evaluation of dental implants with different surfaces: Removal torque and resonance frequency analysis in rabbits. J Adv Prosthodont. 2009 Jul;1(2):107-12. doi: 10.4047/jap.2009.1.2.107.

Soares PB, Moura CC, Claudino M, Carvalho VF, Rocha FS, Zanetta-Barbosa D. Influence of Implant Surfaces on Osseointegration: A Histomorphometric and Implant Stability Study in Rabbits. Braz Dent J. 2015 Oct;26(5):451-7. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201300411.

Park IP, Kim SK, Lee SJ, Lee JH. The relationship between initial implant stability quotient values and bone-to-implant contact ratio in the rabbit tibia. J Adv Prosthodont. 2011 Jun;3(2):76-80. doi: 10.4047/jap.2011.3.2.76.

Carmo Filho LCD, Marcello-Machado RM, Castilhos ED, Del Bel Cury AA, Faot F. Can implant surfaces affect implant stability during osseointegration? A randomized clinical trial. Braz Oral Res. 2018 Oct 25;32:e110. doi: 10.1590/1807-3107bor-2018.

Cho SA, Park KT. The removal torque of titanium screw inserted in rabbit tibia treated by dual acid etching. Biomaterials. 2003 Sep;24(20):3611-7. doi: 10.1016/s0142-9612(03)00218-7.

Published

2025-04-30

Issue

Section

Artículos Originales/ Original articles

How to Cite

1.
Rodríguez A, Navarro MC, Ibañez JC, Grenón MS. Biomechanical evaluation of implants with different surfaces: analysis of stability coefficient and removal torque in rabbits. kiru [Internet]. 2025 Apr. 30 [cited 2026 Aug. 12];22(2):73-82. Available from: https://portalrevistas.aulavirtualusmp.pe/index.php/Rev-Kiru0/article/view/3137

Similar Articles

1-10 of 284

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.