El tratamiento “all-on-four” como solución en los implantes dentales
Palabras clave:
All on Four, Implantes Inclinados, Mandíbula Edéntula, Maxilar Edéntulo, Prótesis Dental, Carga InmediataResumen
El presente informe tiene como propósito el de llegar a una idea sobre el tratamiento “all-on-four”, sobre lo sencillo del procedimiento clínico y los pro y contras que dan para realizarlo; centrándose principalmente en las indicaciones de tratamiento, procedimientos quirúrgicos y protocolos protésicos, y en segundo lugar en las complicaciones mecánicas y biológicas involucradas. Se ejecutó una búsqueda en PubMed y Cochrane, con los descriptores (“all-on-four”), (“implantes dentales”), (“complicación de all-on-four”), (“manejo de all-on-four”) y (“técnicas”), donde se analizaba los trabajos de investigación que evidencien el abordaje protésico y quirúrgico de los implantes “all-on-four”, así como sus consecuencias. El objetivo de tratamiento “all-on-four” es evaluar la tasa de supervivencia de los implantes para rehabilitar maxilar y mandíbula completamente edéntulos.
Descargas
Referencias
Zincir ÖÖ, Parlar A. Comparison of stresses in monoblock tilted implants and conventional angled multiunit abutment-implant connection systems in the all-on-four procedure. BMC Oral Health. 2021 Dec 16;21(1):646. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-02023-y.
Taruna M, Chittaranjan B, Sudheer N, Tella S, Abusaad M. Prosthodontic perspective to all-on-4® concept for dental implants. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Oct;8(10):ZE16-9. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/9648.5020.
Durkan R, Oyar P, Deste G. Maxillary and mandibular all-on-four implant designs: A review. Niger J Clin Pract. 2019 Aug;22(8):1033-1040. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_273_18.
Soni R, Yadav H, Pathak A, Bhatnagar A, Kumar V. Comparative evaluation of biting force and chewing efficiency of all-on-four treatment concept with other treatment modalities in completely edentulous individuals. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020 Jul-Sep;20(3):312-320. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_464_19.
Pan Y, Heng C, Wu ZJ, Tam J, Hsung RT, Pow EH, Lam WY. Comparison of the virtual techniques in registering single implant position with a universal-coordinate system: An in vitro study. J Dent. 2022 Feb;117:103925. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103925.
Türker N, Büyükkaplan US, Sadowsky SJ, Özarslan MM. Finite Element Stress Analysis of Applied Forces to Implants and Supporting Tissues Using the "All-on-Four" Concept with Different Occlusal Schemes. J Prosthodont. 2019 Feb;28(2):185-194. doi: 10.1111/jopr.13004.
Fernández-Ruiz JA, Sánchez-Siles M, Guerrero-Sánchez Y, Pato-Mourelo J, Camacho-Alonso F. Evaluation of Quality of Life and Satisfaction in Patients with Fixed Prostheses on Zygomatic Implants Compared with the All-on-Four Concept: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 25;18(7):3426. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073426
de Araújo Nobre M, Maló P, Gonçalves I. Evaluation of Clinical Soft Tissue Parameters for Extramaxillary Zygomatic Implants and Conventional Implants in All-on-4 Hybrid Rehabilitations: Short-Term Outcome and Proposal of Clinical Recommendations for Intervention in Recall Appointments. Implant Dent. 2015 Jun;24(3):267-74. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000253.
Shankar SD, Doddamani S. To evaluate and compare the accuracy of definitive casts using various splinting methods on implant level impressions in All-on-Four treatment: An in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020 Apr-Jun;20(2):193-201. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_210_19. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
Siadat H, Alikhasi M, Beyabanaki E, Rahimian S. Comparison of Different Impression Techniques When Using the All-on-Four Implant Treatment Protocol. Int J Prosthodont. 2016 May-Jun;29(3):265-70. doi: 10.11607/ijp.4341.
Balshi TJ, Wolfinger GJ, Slauch RW, Balshi SF. A retrospective analysis of 800 Brånemark System implants following the All-on-Four™ protocol. J Prosthodont. 2014 Feb;23(2):83-8. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12089.
Gaonkar SH, Aras MA, Chitre V, Mascarenhas K, Amin B, Rajagopal P. Survival rates of axial and tilted implants in the rehabilitation of edentulous jaws using the All-on-four™ concept: A systematic review. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2021 Jan-Mar;21(1):3-10. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_100_20.
Zhao R, Yang R, Cooper PR, Khurshid Z, Shavandi A, Ratnayake J. Bone Grafts and Substitutes in Dentistry: A Review of Current Trends and Developments. Molecules. 2021 May 18;26(10):3007. doi: 10.3390/molecules26103007.
Dewi AH, Ana ID. The use of hydroxyapatite bone substitute grafting for alveolar ridge preservation, sinus augmentation, and periodontal bone defect: A systematic review. Heliyon. 2018 Nov 2;4(10):e00884. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00884.
Maló P, Araújo Nobre MD, Lopes A, Rodrigues R. Double Full-Arch Versus Single Full-Arch, Four Implant-Supported Rehabilitations: A Retrospective, 5-Year Cohort Study. J Prosthodont. 2015 Jun;24(4):263-70. doi: 10.1111/jopr.12228.
Gaonkar SH, Aras MA, Chitre V, Mascarenhas K, Amin B, Rajagopal P. Survival rates of axial and tilted implants in the rehabilitation of edentulous jaws using the All-on-four™ concept: A systematic review. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2021 Jan-Mar;21(1):3-10. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_100_20.
Sun X, Cheng K, Liu Y, Ke S, Zhang W, Wang L, Yang F. Biomechanical comparison of all-on-4 and all-on-5 implant-supported prostheses with alteration of anterior-posterior spread: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2023 Jun 16;11:1187504. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2023.1187504.
Maló P, de Araújo Nobre M, Lopes A, Ferro A, Gravito I. All-on-4® Treatment Concept for the Rehabilitation of the Completely Edentulous Mandible: A 7-Year Clinical and 5-Year Radiographic Retrospective Case Series with Risk Assessment for Implant Failure and Marginal Bone Level. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015 Oct;17 Suppl 2:e531-41. doi: 10.1111/cid.12282.
Maló P, de Araújo Nobre M, Lopes A, Ferro A, Botto J. The All-on-4 treatment concept for the rehabilitation of the completely edentulous mandible: A longitudinal study with 10 to 18 years of follow-up. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Aug;21(4):565-577. doi: 10.1111/cid.12769.
de Araújo Nobre M, Maló P, Gonçalves I. Evaluation of Clinical Soft Tissue Parameters for Extramaxillary Zygomatic Implants and Conventional Implants in All-on-4 Hybrid Rehabilitations: Short-Term Outcome and Proposal of Clinical Recommendations for Intervention in Recall Appointments. Implant Dent. 2015 Jun;24(3):267-74. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000253.
Gönül O, Çicek A, Afat İM, Akdoğan ET, Atalı O. Biomechanical Comparison of Asymmetric Implant Configurations for All-on-Four Treatment Using Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis. Life (Basel). 2022 Nov 23;12(12):1963. doi: 10.3390/life12121963.
Cattoni F, Chirico L, Merlone A, Manacorda M, Vinci R, Gherlone EF. Digital Smile Designed Computer-Aided Surgery versus Traditional Workflow in "All on Four" Rehabilitations: A Randomized Clinical Trial with 4-Years Follow-Up. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 26;18(7):3449. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18073449.
Maló P, de Araújo Nobre M, Lopes A, Moss S. Posterior maxillary implants inserted with bicortical anchorage and placed in immediate function for partial or complete edentulous rehabilitations. A retrospective clinical study with a median follow-up of 7 years. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Mar;19(1):19-27. doi: 10.1007/s10006-014-0444-7. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
Szabó ÁL, Nagy ÁL, Lászlófy C, Gajdács M, Bencsik P, Kárpáti K, Baráth Z. Distally Tilted Implants According to the All-on-Four® Treatment Concept for the Rehabilitation of Complete Edentulism: A 3.5-Year Retrospective Radiographic Study of Clinical Outcomes and Marginal Bone Level Changes. Dent J (Basel). 2022 May 11;10(5):82. doi: 10.3390/dj10050082.
Grandi T, Signorini L. Rehabilitation of the Completely Edentulous Mandible by All-on-Four Treatment Concept: A Retrospective Cohort Study with Up to 10 Years Follow-Up. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Dec 22;58(1):10. doi: 10.3390/medicina58010010.
Wang Q, Zhang ZZ, Bai SZ, Zhang SF. Biomechanical analysis of stress around the tilted implants with different cantilever lengths in all-on-4 concept. BMC Oral Health. 2022 Nov 5;22(1):469. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02520-8.
Pandey A, Durrani F, Rai SK, Singh NK, Singh P, Verma R, Kumar J. Comparison between all-on-four and all-on-six treatment concepts on stress distribution for full-mouth rehabilitation using three-dimensional finite element analysis: A biomechanical study. J Indian Soc Periodontol. 2023 Mar-Apr;27(2):180-188. doi: 10.4103/jisp.jisp_278_22.
Okuhama Y, Nagata K, Kim H, Tsuruoka H, Atsumi M, Kawana H. Validation of an implant stability measurement device using the percussion response: a clinical research study. BMC Oral Health. 2022 Jul 14;22(1):286. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02320-0.
Sivrikaya EC, Yilmaz O. Comparison of Extramaxillary Anchored Implants, Tilted Implants, or Sinus Elevation Concepts on Stress Distribution in Atrophic Maxilla: A Finite Element Analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2022 May-Jun;37(3):563-570. doi: 10.11607/jomi.9631.
Shankar SD, Doddamani S. To evaluate and compare the accuracy of definitive casts using various splinting methods on implant level impressions in All-on-Four treatment: An in vitro study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020 Apr-Jun;20(2):193-201. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_210_19.
Toledano M, Osorio MT, Vallecillo-Rivas M, Toledano-Osorio M, Rodríguez-Archilla A, Toledano R, Osorio R. Efficacy of local antibiotic therapy in the treatment of peri-implantitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2021 Oct;113:103790. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2021.103790. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
Deste G, Durkan R. Effects of all-on-four implant designs in mandible on implants and the surrounding bone: A 3-D finite element analysis. Niger J Clin Pract. 2020 Apr;23(4):456-463. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_471_19.
Murugaian J, Ganesan L, Shankar MSS, Annapoorni H. A comparative evaluation of stress distribution between an All-on-Four implant-supported prosthesis and the Trefoil implant-supported prosthesis: A three-dimensional finite element analysis study. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2022 Jan-Mar;22(1):56-64. doi: 10.4103/jips.jips_203_21.
Soto-Penaloza D, Zaragozí-Alonso R, Penarrocha-Diago M, Penarrocha-Diago M. The all-on-four treatment concept: Systematic review. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017 Mar 1;9(3):e474-e488. doi: 10.4317/jced.53613.
Durkan R, Oyar P, Deste G. Maxillary and mandibular all-on-four implant designs: A review. Niger J Clin Pract. 2019 Aug;22(8):1033-1040. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_273_18.
Galindo-Moreno P, Fernández-Jiménez A, Avila-Ortiz G, Silvestre FJ, Hernández-Cortés P, Wang HL. Marginal bone loss around implants placed in maxillary native bone or grafted sinuses: a retrospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2014 Mar;25(3):378-384. doi: 10.1111/clr.12122. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
Bozyel D, Taşar Faruk S. Biomechanical Behavior of All-on-4 and M-4 Configurations in an Atrophic Maxilla: A 3D Finite Element Method. Med Sci Monit. 2021 Mar 28;27:e929908. doi: 10.12659/MSM.929908.
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
- Los autores/as conservarán sus derechos de autor y garantizarán a la revista el derecho de primera publicación de su obra, el cuál estará simultáneamente sujeto a la Licencia de reconocimiento de Creative Commons que permite a terceros compartir la obra siempre que se indique su autor y su primera publicación esta revista.
- Los autores/as podrán adoptar otros acuerdos de licencia no exclusiva de distribución de la versión de la obra publicada (p. ej.: depositarla en un archivo telemático institucional o publicarla en un volumen monográfico) siempre que se indique la publicación inicial en esta revista.
- Se permite y recomienda a los autores/as difundir su obra a través de Internet (p. ej.: en archivos telemáticos institucionales o en su página web) posterior al proceso de aprobación del manuscrito, lo cual puede producir intercambios interesantes y aumentar las citas de la obra publicada.
