Estado actual de las resinas compuestas bulk fill

César Augusto Lamas Lara; José Luis Rojas Barrios; Tammy Margarita Honores Solano

Autores/as

César Augusto Lamas Lara Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, Los Angeles de Chimbote Catholic University
José Luis Rojas Barrios Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, Los Angeles de Chimbote Catholic University
Tammy Margarita Honores Solano Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, Los Angeles de Chimbote Catholic University

Palabras clave:

Resinas Compuestas, Revisión, Odontología

Resumen

La evolución de los materiales restauradores directos para las piezas dentarias posteriores ha llevado a generar procesos más simples y fáciles de ejecutar por el clínico. Es así como surgen las resinas compuestas bulk fill, con la finalidad de simplificar la técnica y brindar al clínico rapidez y practicidad al realizar la restauración. Si bien es cierto estos materiales se vienen usando, todavía existe mucho desconocimiento por parte del profesional de cómo emplearlos correctamente. Además de ciertas limitaciones en las investigaciones publicadas, ya que son materiales relativamente nuevos en el mercado. La presente investigación tiene por objetivo realizar una revisión de la literatura en bases de datos indexadas hasta la fecha sobre las resinas bulk fill, detallando ensayos clínicos, composición y clasificación.

Descargas

Los datos de descarga aún no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

César Augusto Lamas Lara, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, Los Angeles de Chimbote Catholic University

Master in Health Services Management
José Luis Rojas Barrios, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, Los Angeles de Chimbote Catholic University

Doctor of dentistry
Tammy Margarita Honores Solano, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Dentistry, Los Angeles de Chimbote Catholic University

Master in Stomatology

Referencias

Fugolin A, Pfeifer C. New Resins for Dental Composites. J. Dent. Res. 2017;96:1085–1091. doi: 10.1177/0022034517720658.

Ilie N, Hilton T, Heintze S, Hickel R, Watts D, Silikas N, et al. Academy of Dental Materials guidance—Resin composites: Part I—Mechanical properties. Dent. Mater. 2017;33:880–894. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2017.04.013.

Malhotra N, Mala K, Acharya S. Resin-based composite as a direct esthetic restorative material. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2011;32(5):14-23.

Al-Sheikh R. Effects of Different Application Techniques on Nanohybrid Composite Restorations Clinical Success. Open Dent. J. 2019;13:228–235. doi: 10.2174/1874210601913010228.

Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restoration. J Dent. Res. 1987;66(11):1636-9.

Versluis A, Douglas WH, Cross M, Sakaguchi RL. Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses? J Dent Res. 1996;75(3):871-8.

Leprince JG, Leveque P, Nysten B, Gallez B, Devaux J, Leloup G. New insight into the "depth of cure" of dimethacrylate-based dental composites. Dent Mater. 2012;28(5):512-20.

Loguercio AD, Reis A, Ballester RY. Polymerization shrinkage: effects of constraint and filling technique in composite restorations. Dent Mater. 2004;20(3):236-43.

Lins R, Aristilde S, Osório J, Cordeiro C, Yanikian C, Bicalho A, et al. Biomechanical behaviour of bulk-fill resin composites in class II restorations. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed Mater. 2019;98:255–261. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2019.06.032.

Cidreira L, Pereira D, de Souza A, Lie E, Ayala M, Pfeifer C, Gonçalves F. Clinical performance and chemical-physical properties of bulk fill composites resin —a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dent Mater. 2019;35:e249–e264. doi:10.1016/j.dental.2019.07.007.

Liberati A, Altman D, Tetzlaff J, Mulrow C, Gøtzsche P, Ioannidis J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7):e1000100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100.

Manhart J, Chen H, Hickel R. Clinical evaluation of the posterior composite Quixfil in class I and II cavities: 4-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. J Adhes Dent. 2010;12:237–43. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a17551.

van Dijken J, Pallesen U. Bulk-filled posterior resin restorations based on stress-decreasing resin technology: a randomized, controlled 6-year evaluation. Eur. J. Oral Sci. 2017;125:303–309. doi: 10.1111/eos.12351.

Yazici A, Antonson S, Kutuk Z, Ergin E. Thirty-six-month clinical comparison of bulk fill and nanofill composite restorations. Oper Dent. 2017;42:478–485. doi: 10.2341/16-220-C.

Bayraktar Y, Ercan E, Hamidi M, Çolak H. One-year clinical evaluation of different types of bulk-fill composites. J Investig Clin Dent. 2017;8:1–9. doi: 10.1111/jicd.12210.

Balkaya H, Arslan S. A Two-year Clinical Comparison of Three Different Restorative Materials in Class II Cavities. Oper Dent. 2020;45:E32–E42. doi: 10.2341/19-078-C.

Hickel R, Roulet J, Bayne S, Heintze S, Mjör I, Peters M, et al. Recommendations for conducting controlled clinical studies of dental restorative materials. Clin Oral Investig. 2007;11:5–33.

Göstemeyer G, Blunck U, Paris S, Schwendicke F. Design and Validity of Randomized Controlled Dental Restorative Trials. Materials (Basel). 2016;9(5):372. doi: 10.3390/ma9050372.

Ivoclar Vivadent. Tetric Evoceram Bulkfill, Instructions for use. [consultado el 11 enero del 2023]. Accesible en: http://www.ivoclarvivadent.us/en-us/composites/restorative-materials/tetric-evoceram-bulk-fill.

Heck K, Manhart J, Hickel R, Diegritz C. Clinical evaluation of the bulk fill composite QuiXfil in molar class I and II cavities: 10-year results of a RCT. Dent Mater. 2018;34:e138–e147. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2018.03.023.

Burgess J, Cakir D. Comparative properties of low-shrinkage composite resins. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2010;31(2):10-5.

Ilie N, Bucuta S, Draenert M. Bulk-fill resin-based composites: an in vitro assessment of their mechanical performance. Oper Dent. 2013;38(6):618-25.

Czasch P, Ilie N. In vitro comparison of mechanical properties and degree of cure of bulk fill composites. Clin Oral Investig. 2013;17(1):227-35.

Tiba A, Zeller G, Estrich C, Hong A. A laboratory evaluation of bulk-fill versus traditional multi-increment-fill resin-based-composites. ADA Professional Product Review. 2013;8(3):13-26.

Al-Ahdal K, Silikas N, Watts DC. Rheological properties of resin composites according to variations in composition and temperature. Dent Mater. 2014;30(5):517-524. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.02.005. [Epub 2014 Mar 12].

Roggendorf M, Kramer N, Appelt A, Naumann M, Frankenberger R. Marginal quality of flowable 4-mm base vs. conventionally layered resin composite. J Dent. 2011;39(10):643-7.

Leprince J, Palin W, Vanacker J, Sabbagh J, Devaux J, Leloup G. Physico-mechanical characteristics of commercially available bulk-fill composites. J Dent. 2014;42:993–1000. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.05.009.

Correia A, Jurema A, Andrade M, Borges A, Bresciani E, Caneppele T. Clinical Evaluation of Noncarious Cervical Lesions of Different Extensions Restored With Bulk-fill or Conventional Resin Composite: Preliminary Results of a Randomized Clinical Trial. Oper Dent. 2020;45: E11–E20. doi: 10.2341/18-256-C.

Veloso S, Lemos C, de Moraes S, do Egito Vasconcelos B, Pellizzer E, de Melo Monteiro G. Clinical performance of bulk-fill and conventional resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2019;23:221–233. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2429-7.

Bayne S, Schmalz G. Reprinting the classic article on USPHS evaluation methods for measuring the clinical research performance of restorative materials. Clin Oral Investig. 2005;9:1–6, doi:10.1007/s00784-005-0017-0.

Canali G, Ignácio S, Rached R, Souza E. One-year clinical evaluation of bulk-fill flowable vs. regular nanofilled composite in non-carious cervical lesions. Clin. Oral Investig. 2019;23:889–897. doi: 10.1007/s00784-018-2509-8.

Ilie N, Hickel R. Investigations on a methacrylate-based flowable composite based on the SDR technology. Dent Mater. 2011;27(4):348-55.

El-Damanhoury H, Platt J. Polymerization Shrinkage Stress Kinetics and Related Properties of Bulk-fill Resin Composites. Oper Dent. 2014;39(4):374-382.

Al-Sheikh R. Effects of Different Application Techniques on Nanohybrid Composite Restorations Clinical Success. Open Dent J. 2019;13:228–235. doi: 10.2174/1874210601913010228.

Frascino S, Fagundes T, Silva U, Rahal V, Barboza A, Santo P, et al. Randomized prospective clinical trial of class II restorations using low-shrinkage flowable resin composite. Oper. Dent. 2020;45:19–29. doi: 10.2341/18-230-C

Oter B, Deniz K, Cehreli S. Preliminary data on clinical performance of bulk-fill restorations in primary molars. Niger J Clin Pract. 2018;21:1484–1491. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_151_18.

Akman H, Tosun G. Clinical evaluation of bulk-fill resins and glass ionomer restorative materials: A 1-year follow-up randomized clinical trial in children. Niger J Clin Pract. 2020;23:489–497. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_519_19.